Sufficient Reason for Contingent Facts Does Not Imply a Personal Deity

1. 01Define the thesis precisely

   completed

   Define the thesis precisely as the claim that PSR does not entail a personal deity.

2. 02Identify assumptions and key terms

   completed

   Identify assumptions (PSR true, necessary being exists) and key terms (PSR, necessary being, personal deity).

3. 03Specify supporting and opposing evidence

   completed

   Specify that evidence should address whether PSR forces personal attributes.

4. 04Gather primary and secondary sources

   completed

   Gather primary sources: SEP entries on PSR and cosmological argument.

5. 05Extract claims and relevant evidence

   completed

   Extract relevant claims: definition of PSR, Leibniz's use of PSR to infer God.

6. 06Evaluate source reliability and verify claims

   inconclusive

   Evaluate reliability: Stanford Encyclopedia is scholarly; Wikipedia provides background but is less authoritative.

7. 07Construct the strongest supporting argument

   completed

   Construct supporting argument showing PSR leads only to a necessary being, not personal traits.

8. 08Construct the strongest opposing argument

   completed

   Construct opposing argument that adds a disputed premise linking necessity to personal attributes.

9. 09Test logical structure and assumptions

   completed

   Test logical structure: supporting argument valid given premises; opposing argument invalid due to unsupported premise.

10. 10Compare competing explanations

    completed

    Compare alternatives: abstract necessary entity, brute fact multiverse, modified PSR.

11. 11Record unresolved issues

    completed

    Record unresolved issues: truth of PSR, existence of necessary being, nature of that being.

12. 12Produce the current assessment

    completed

    Current status: underdetermined.

No revisions recorded.